What Is a Source-Oriented Medical Record?
A Source-Oriented Medical Record (SOMR) is a way to organize a patient’s medical information. In this system, each healthcare department or “source” keeps its own separate section in the patient’s chart. For example, the lab puts all its results in one part. The nurses write their notes in another part. The doctors put their notes in a different part. The X-ray department has its own area too.
Think of it like a filing cabinet with many folders. Each folder belongs to one type of healthcare worker or one department. When you open the patient’s chart, you see clear sections: “Labs,” “Nursing Notes,” “Physician Notes,” “Radiology,” “Therapy,” and so on. Everything from that source stays inside its own folder. This makes it easy to find all the lab results together, but harder to see the whole story in one place.
How Is the SOMR Used? (Use)
In a busy hospital or clinic, the SOMR is very common. A nurse starts her shift. She opens the patient’s chart. She goes straight to the “Nursing Notes” section. There, she writes her assessment, vital signs, and anything she did for the patient. She does not mix her notes with the doctor’s orders or lab results. That keeps her work clean and organized.
Later, a doctor comes to see the same patient. The doctor opens the “Physician Notes” section. He writes his exam findings, diagnosis, and treatment plan. He also looks at the “Labs” section to check blood test results. Then he checks the “Radiology” section to see the X-ray report. To understand everything, the doctor must flip between sections. The SOMR is still used today in many paper charts and some electronic health records (EHRs) that are designed by department.
SOMR Examples
Example 1: A patient with chest pain.
- The nurse writes in Nursing Notes: “Patient says pain is 7/10. Heart rate 110. Gave oxygen.”
- The lab puts blood work in Labs: “Troponin level high.”
- The doctor writes in Physician Notes: “Likely heart attack. Admit to ICU.”
- The EKG tech puts results in Cardiology: “ST elevation present.”
Each source has its own section. Nobody writes in another’s area.
Example 2: A patient after knee surgery.
- Physical therapy writes in Therapy Notes: “Patient walked 20 feet with crutches.”
- Pharmacy writes in Medication Records: “Given morphine 2mg IV at 2 PM.”
- The nurse writes in Nursing Notes: “Surgical wound clean. Patient sleeping.”
- The surgeon writes in Operative Notes: “Knee repair done. No complications.”
All these notes are separate. To see the full picture, a provider must read every section.
Advantages of the Source-Oriented Medical Record (Pros)
Advantage 1: Easy to find information from one department.
If you are a nurse, you know exactly where to write your notes. If you are a lab technician, you know where to put results. This saves time because you do not search through random pages. Each source has its own home. This also makes it simple to track what each department did for the patient.
Advantage 2: Clear accountability and legal protection.
In court or during an audit, you can see exactly who wrote what. Each source’s section shows who made each entry. If a note is wrong, you know which department or person made the error. This protects patients and healthcare workers. It also makes it easy to see if a required note (like a discharge summary) is missing from that source’s area.
Advantage 3: Works well with paper charts and old systems.
Many hospitals still use paper charts or older electronic systems. The SOMR is simple to set up. You just make different tabs or folders. No special training is needed beyond knowing which section to use. For small clinics or rural hospitals with limited resources, the SOMR is a practical choice.
Disadvantages of the Source-Oriented Medical Record (Cons)
Disadvantage 1: Information is scattered. Hard to see the whole patient story.
To understand a patient’s problem, you must read five different sections. You jump from nursing notes to lab results to doctor’s orders to radiology reports. This takes time. Sometimes you miss important information because it is hidden in another section. For example, a nurse might write “patient is confused” in nursing notes, but the doctor never sees it because he only reads physician notes. This can lead to medical errors.
Disadvantage 2: Duplication and wasted time.
Each source often repeats the same information. The nurse writes the patient’s age and allergies. The doctor writes the same age and allergies again. The therapist writes it again. This wastes time. It also increases the risk of mistakes. If one person writes “allergy to penicillin” but another forgets to write it, the record is not consistent.
Disadvantage 3: No clear timeline of events.
In the SOMR, notes are grouped by source, not by date. So you might see Monday’s doctor note, then Friday’s doctor note, then Tuesday’s nurse note. It is hard to follow what happened in order. For a patient who is getting worse quickly, this can be dangerous. You want to see the sequence: first this happened, then that happened. The SOMR does not make that easy.
SOMR vs. POMR (Problem-Oriented Medical Record)
What Is POMR?
POMR stands for Problem-Oriented Medical Record. Instead of organizing by department (source), the POMR organizes by the patient’s problems. For example, if a patient has three problems (high blood pressure, diabetes, and knee pain), the chart has a section for each problem. Under “high blood pressure,” you put all notes, labs, and treatments related to that problem. Under “diabetes,” you put everything related to blood sugar. This is a very different way of thinking.
Key Differences Between SOMR and POMR
| Feature | SOMR (Source-Oriented) | POMR (Problem-Oriented) |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | By department (nursing, lab, doctor) | By patient problem (diabetes, pain, fever) |
| Where to write | In your department’s section | Under the specific problem list |
| Finding related info | Must check multiple sections | All info on one problem is together |
| Timeline clarity | Hard to see order of events | Uses a structured format (SOAP notes) |
| Learning curve | Easy to learn | Takes more training |
| Risk of missing info | Higher (scattered data) | Lower (problem-focused) |
An Example Comparing Both
Patient: Mr. Jones with chest pain and high blood sugar.
SOMR:
- Nursing Notes: “Chest pain, gave nitro.”
- Labs: “Glucose 300.”
- Physician Notes: “Chest pain likely angina. Blood sugar high.”
You must read three sections to connect chest pain and blood sugar.
POMR:
- Problem #1: Chest pain. Under this: nurse note “chest pain,” lab (troponin), doctor note “angina.”
- Problem #2: High blood sugar. Under this: lab (glucose 300), doctor note “give insulin.”
Each problem tells its own complete story.
Which One Is Better?
Neither is perfect. The SOMR is simpler for paper charts and for departments that work separately. The POMR is better for seeing the whole patient and for avoiding missed information. Many modern electronic health records (EHRs) use a mix of both. They keep some source-based sections but also use problem lists and SOAP notes (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan). As a healthcare professional, you should know both systems. Your job may use SOMR, POMR, or a hybrid.
Other Important Things to Know About SOMR
The Role of SOMR in Modern Electronic Health Records (EHRs)
You might think SOMR is old and only for paper charts. But many EHRs still show source-based organization. For example, in Epic or Cerner, you often click tabs like “Labs,” “Medications,” “Nursing Notes,” “Provider Notes.” That is the SOMR idea living inside a computer. The difference is that computers can search across sections. So you get the best of both worlds: clear source sections plus fast searching. Still, the core structure remains source-oriented.
How to Make SOMR Work Better for Your Team
If your clinic or hospital uses SOMR, you can reduce its problems with a few simple rules:
- Always write the date and time clearly on every note. This helps create a timeline.
- Use a “summary sheet” at the front of the chart. Write key problems, allergies, and recent changes there.
- Cross-reference. In your note, write “see lab section for blood results” or “see nursing note for vital signs.”
- Do regular chart audits to make sure no critical information is trapped in one source that others ignore.
Legal and Reimbursement Considerations
Insurance companies and auditors still accept SOMR. But they prefer records that show a clear story. If your SOMR is messy or scattered, you might lose money because you cannot prove you provided necessary care. Also, in lawsuits, a scattered SOMR can look like poor care. That is why many hospitals have moved toward POMR or hybrid systems. However, SOMR remains legally acceptable if it is complete, timely, and readable.
AI-Powered • HIPAA-Ready
Let AI handle your clinical notes.
Skriber listens during the visit and creates complete SOAP notes in seconds — so you can stay focused on the patient.
-
Capture Ambient listening during sessions
-
Transcribe Speech → text instantly
-
Generate SOAP Accurate structured notes
-
Review & sign Edit and finalize instantly
Training New Staff on SOMR
Teaching a new nurse or doctor about SOMR is easy. You say: “Put your notes only in your department’s section. Do not write in the lab section. Do not write in the therapy section. Always sign and date your entry.” That is it. Within one day, most people understand SOMR. With POMR, training takes longer because they must learn problem lists, SOAP notes, and numbering systems. For busy units with high staff turnover, SOMR is faster to teach.
Final Verdict: Should You Use SOMR?
Use SOMR if:
- You work with paper charts or a basic electronic system.
- Your departments work mostly independently.
- You need a simple, easy-to-train system.
- Legal clarity (who wrote what) is your top priority.
Avoid SOMR if:
- Your patients have many complex, overlapping problems.
- You need a clear timeline of events (like in an ICU or emergency room).
- Your team keeps missing information because it is scattered.
- You want to reduce duplication and save time.
Conclusion: The Past, Present, and Future of SOMR
The Source-Oriented Medical Record has been around for decades. It is not fancy, but it works. It keeps each department’s notes separate and organized. For small clinics, paper-based systems, and certain hospital units, SOMR is still a good choice. But it has real flaws. Scattered information, duplication, and poor timelines can hurt patient safety.
Today, most healthcare systems use a hybrid model. They keep some source-based sections (like labs and radiology) but add a problem list and chronological notes. As a healthcare professional, you will likely see SOMR in some form for many years. Understand its strengths and weaknesses. Use it correctly when you must. And when you see its limits, push for better organization, whether that means a POMR, a hybrid, or a smarter EHR.
Your goal is always the same: a clear, complete, and safe record for every patient. SOMR can help you get there, but only if you use it wisely.
for clinicians · HIPAA-ready
Spend more time with patients, not paperwork.
Skriber transforms ambient speech into accurate SOAP notes — finished before your next session.
No credit card required.
Dr. Connor Yost is an Internal Medicine resident at Creighton University School of Medicine in Arizona and an emerging leader in clinical innovation. He currently serves as Chief Medical Officer at Skriber, where he helps shape AI-powered tools that streamline clinical documentation and support physicians in delivering higher-quality care. Dr. Yost also works as a Strategic Advisor at Doc2Doc, lending his expertise to initiatives that improve financial wellness for physicians and trainees.
His professional interests include medical education, workflow redesign, and the responsible use of AI in healthcare. Dr. Yost is committed to building systems that allow clinicians to spend more time with patients and less on administrative tasks. Outside of medicine, he enjoys photography, entrepreneurship, and family life.




